Post by Cindy Lam on Feb 13, 2015 23:33:22 GMT
1. Why is Faqir Chand’s experiences important in understanding the projective nature of religious visions and miracles?
After watching the video ‘‘Inner Visions and Running Trains’’ and the book The Unknowing Sage, I learned that Faqir Chand was a railway station master in a military battle in Iraq in 1919. Heavy loss was in both sides and his division was short of ammunition. If there is another attack before dawn without supplies, all of them would die. Under the fear of death, Faqir has seen the Holy form of Hazur Data Dayal Ji telling him not to be afraid. ‘‘Faqir, worry not, the enemy has not come to attack but to take away their dead. Let them do that. Don’t waste your ammunition.’’ His guru was real, plus it took away their fears, and gained courage to the solders. His religious visions of Hazur Data Dayal have save all and create a miracle. ‘’Ignorance(transference) A master gained power, attention, and devotion from disciples who incorrectly imputed omniscience and omnipresence upon such teaches, even though they had neither.’’ No one knows what would happen, but the projective nature of God’s will is supreme.
2. What is meant by the phrase, ‘‘Philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy’’
I found some related comments about ‘‘Philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy’’ in the book Ocean Metaphor, on page 33 included some thinkers like Henri Bergson ‘‘believed that the secrets of genetics would never by revealed by biochemistry because there was something inherently non-reducible in life’s coding system.’’ For the same topic, Francis Crick and James Watson have proven that his hypothesis or theory was wrong. The DNA structure has the fundamental language in life’s evolutions of four basic building blocks. From this incident, we know that Henri Bergson stays in his own consciousness of genetic in coding system, but Crick and Watson took an extra step to configure out the cause. The hypothesis that is not yet been approached or not able to prove right is not going further, and remains as a philosophy. On the other hand, if the concept is proven to be right, then it became a science.
After watching the video ‘‘Inner Visions and Running Trains’’ and the book The Unknowing Sage, I learned that Faqir Chand was a railway station master in a military battle in Iraq in 1919. Heavy loss was in both sides and his division was short of ammunition. If there is another attack before dawn without supplies, all of them would die. Under the fear of death, Faqir has seen the Holy form of Hazur Data Dayal Ji telling him not to be afraid. ‘‘Faqir, worry not, the enemy has not come to attack but to take away their dead. Let them do that. Don’t waste your ammunition.’’ His guru was real, plus it took away their fears, and gained courage to the solders. His religious visions of Hazur Data Dayal have save all and create a miracle. ‘’Ignorance(transference) A master gained power, attention, and devotion from disciples who incorrectly imputed omniscience and omnipresence upon such teaches, even though they had neither.’’ No one knows what would happen, but the projective nature of God’s will is supreme.
2. What is meant by the phrase, ‘‘Philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy’’
I found some related comments about ‘‘Philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy’’ in the book Ocean Metaphor, on page 33 included some thinkers like Henri Bergson ‘‘believed that the secrets of genetics would never by revealed by biochemistry because there was something inherently non-reducible in life’s coding system.’’ For the same topic, Francis Crick and James Watson have proven that his hypothesis or theory was wrong. The DNA structure has the fundamental language in life’s evolutions of four basic building blocks. From this incident, we know that Henri Bergson stays in his own consciousness of genetic in coding system, but Crick and Watson took an extra step to configure out the cause. The hypothesis that is not yet been approached or not able to prove right is not going further, and remains as a philosophy. On the other hand, if the concept is proven to be right, then it became a science.